Post by SEO on Jan 11, 2024 1:49:13 GMT -7
The Sixth Section of the Contentious-Administrative Chamber has confirmed the sanction of 18 months of suspension of functions imposed by the Plenary Session of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) to the Judge of First Instance and Instruction No. 1 of Arévalo (Ávila) for not abstaining from a procedure to modify measures in which a woman with whom he had an intimate friendship was a party. The Chamber rejects the contentious-administrative appeal filed by the judge against the agreement of the Plenary of the CGPJ, of March 26, 2020, which confirmed the sanction imposed by the .
Disciplinary Commission for a very serious breach of article 417.8 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary , which punishes “failure to comply with the duty of abstention knowing that one of the legally established Phone Number Data causes exists.” The account of proven facts details that the judge issued an order, on May 24, 2018, in which he partially upheld the claim filed by this woman and modified the sentence of guard and custody and support of the youngest daughter of the couple, which was dictated two years earlier. Specifically, he suspended the father's visitation rights to the girl and increased the child support that she had to pay by 250 euros.
That same day, the judge attended an event of the Civil Guard in Ávila , where he was awarded a decoration, and they took a photograph together. Facade of the Supreme Court. (Photo: Google) Also that day, the girl's father commissioned a private detective to conduct an investigation which revealed that there was a personal relationship between the judge and his ex-partner. That report, according to the proven facts, was provided to the case on June 14. On that same date, the judge requested that he abstain from the procedure . The Chamber concludes that the relationship of intimate friendship between the judge on record and the woman began before May 24, 2018, the day on which he issued the order in which he ruled against the parent , and not after, as the court maintains.
Disciplinary Commission for a very serious breach of article 417.8 of the Organic Law of the Judiciary , which punishes “failure to comply with the duty of abstention knowing that one of the legally established Phone Number Data causes exists.” The account of proven facts details that the judge issued an order, on May 24, 2018, in which he partially upheld the claim filed by this woman and modified the sentence of guard and custody and support of the youngest daughter of the couple, which was dictated two years earlier. Specifically, he suspended the father's visitation rights to the girl and increased the child support that she had to pay by 250 euros.
That same day, the judge attended an event of the Civil Guard in Ávila , where he was awarded a decoration, and they took a photograph together. Facade of the Supreme Court. (Photo: Google) Also that day, the girl's father commissioned a private detective to conduct an investigation which revealed that there was a personal relationship between the judge and his ex-partner. That report, according to the proven facts, was provided to the case on June 14. On that same date, the judge requested that he abstain from the procedure . The Chamber concludes that the relationship of intimate friendship between the judge on record and the woman began before May 24, 2018, the day on which he issued the order in which he ruled against the parent , and not after, as the court maintains.